In some jurisdictions the deceased have a right of publicity. Do you suppose Mrs. Butterworth does too?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(85)
-
►
December
(10)
- Walter Mercado Still Losing
- Just Another Skirmish or the War?
- Giving An Idea to Your Employer
- Beneficial Owners Don't Have Standing
- Zombie Department Stores Rise (as ugly t-shirts)
- Must All Trademark Owners be Joined?
- Who Owns the Mark Used by a Bunch of People?
- Bratz Copied, But Didn't Infringe
- When You Can Change the Name of the Registrant
- It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time
-
►
June
(13)
- How to Steal a Trademark
- Sibling Rivalry
- Privity as a Sword
- The Coup de GrĂ¢ce for Pooh?
- When Are You a "Distributor"?
- Righthaven's Failed Assignment Agreement
- Important New Patent Ownership Decision!
- Abandoned, No Surprise
- Surprise - Wittmann Can't Call His Product "Wittma...
- There Has to Be Confusion
- Moral Rights versus Economic Rights
- Rejected Trademark License
- Think of the Trademark Too
-
►
December
(10)
-
▼
2008
(95)
-
▼
July
(21)
- Lesson Learned
- Mrs. Butterworth's Right of Publicity
- Oklahoma City or Seattle Supersonics?
- More Bratz
- Who Owns a Dead Mark? Ask River West Brands
- POLAROID
- When Not to Assign Intent-to-Use Applications
- Invention Made for Hire
- Assigning "Goodwill"
- Who Owns the Mark?
- Sold! Or Just Licensed?
- Mattel Wins Bratz!
- Combining Trademarks in a Jointly Owned Holdco
- Exclusive Licensee Doesn't Have Standing, No Matte...
- Lassie Speaks!
- Works Are Never Made for Hire
- Ownership of Music in Snow White
- Warner/Chappell Still Happy on Birthdays
- Summer Reading
- Hot N' Ready For All
- Devil in the Details
-
▼
July
(21)
0 comments:
Post a Comment