There are few disputes more difficult to solve than deciding who owns a trademark after co-owners have a falling out. Family businesses seem particularly susceptible, my guess would be because they are started more casually without formal documents that even contemplate trademark ownership. European trademark blog Class 46 reports one way to solve the problem - an auction. Two brothers argued over who owned the trademark, so the court auctioned it off. It sold for 17.2 million Euro, but the good news is that the brother who bought it only had to pay half, since he already owns half. Class 46 report here.
Monday, July 21, 2008
Who Owns the Mark?
There are few disputes more difficult to solve than deciding who owns a trademark after co-owners have a falling out. Family businesses seem particularly susceptible, my guess would be because they are started more casually without formal documents that even contemplate trademark ownership. European trademark blog Class 46 reports one way to solve the problem - an auction. Two brothers argued over who owned the trademark, so the court auctioned it off. It sold for 17.2 million Euro, but the good news is that the brother who bought it only had to pay half, since he already owns half. Class 46 report here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(85)
-
►
December
(10)
- Walter Mercado Still Losing
- Just Another Skirmish or the War?
- Giving An Idea to Your Employer
- Beneficial Owners Don't Have Standing
- Zombie Department Stores Rise (as ugly t-shirts)
- Must All Trademark Owners be Joined?
- Who Owns the Mark Used by a Bunch of People?
- Bratz Copied, But Didn't Infringe
- When You Can Change the Name of the Registrant
- It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time
-
►
June
(13)
- How to Steal a Trademark
- Sibling Rivalry
- Privity as a Sword
- The Coup de GrĂ¢ce for Pooh?
- When Are You a "Distributor"?
- Righthaven's Failed Assignment Agreement
- Important New Patent Ownership Decision!
- Abandoned, No Surprise
- Surprise - Wittmann Can't Call His Product "Wittma...
- There Has to Be Confusion
- Moral Rights versus Economic Rights
- Rejected Trademark License
- Think of the Trademark Too
-
►
December
(10)
-
▼
2008
(95)
-
▼
July
(21)
- Lesson Learned
- Mrs. Butterworth's Right of Publicity
- Oklahoma City or Seattle Supersonics?
- More Bratz
- Who Owns a Dead Mark? Ask River West Brands
- POLAROID
- When Not to Assign Intent-to-Use Applications
- Invention Made for Hire
- Assigning "Goodwill"
- Who Owns the Mark?
- Sold! Or Just Licensed?
- Mattel Wins Bratz!
- Combining Trademarks in a Jointly Owned Holdco
- Exclusive Licensee Doesn't Have Standing, No Matte...
- Lassie Speaks!
- Works Are Never Made for Hire
- Ownership of Music in Snow White
- Warner/Chappell Still Happy on Birthdays
- Summer Reading
- Hot N' Ready For All
- Devil in the Details
-
▼
July
(21)
0 comments:
Post a Comment