The parties in the Barbie vs. Bratz battle were in court Monday on post-trial motions (blogged here). Read the news here.
© 2008 Pamela Chestek
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(85)
-
►
December
(10)
- Walter Mercado Still Losing
- Just Another Skirmish or the War?
- Giving An Idea to Your Employer
- Beneficial Owners Don't Have Standing
- Zombie Department Stores Rise (as ugly t-shirts)
- Must All Trademark Owners be Joined?
- Who Owns the Mark Used by a Bunch of People?
- Bratz Copied, But Didn't Infringe
- When You Can Change the Name of the Registrant
- It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time
-
►
June
(13)
- How to Steal a Trademark
- Sibling Rivalry
- Privity as a Sword
- The Coup de GrĂ¢ce for Pooh?
- When Are You a "Distributor"?
- Righthaven's Failed Assignment Agreement
- Important New Patent Ownership Decision!
- Abandoned, No Surprise
- Surprise - Wittmann Can't Call His Product "Wittma...
- There Has to Be Confusion
- Moral Rights versus Economic Rights
- Rejected Trademark License
- Think of the Trademark Too
-
►
December
(10)
-
▼
2008
(95)
-
▼
November
(11)
- I Swear I Invented It First
- A Patently Untenable Trademark Claim
- Trifecta of IP Protection
- Buy Your U.S. Cohiba Cigars Now
- Not So Fast
- You Still Have to Own the Copyright
- Mowing Trademarks Down
- Bratz Arguments
- The Dark Underbelly of Teddy Bear Puppies
- The Melody Can Barely be Heard
- What's on Your Pocket?
-
▼
November
(11)
0 comments:
Post a Comment