The IPKat posts on a new case involving the "own name" defense under UK trademark law. The Trade Marks Act 1994 provides that "A registered trade mark is not infringed by - the use by a person of his own name . . . provided the use is in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters."
The IPKat reports that the court wouldn't extend the defense beyond a company's registered name to its trading name. Post here.
© 2008 Pamela Chestek
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(85)
-
►
December
(10)
- Walter Mercado Still Losing
- Just Another Skirmish or the War?
- Giving An Idea to Your Employer
- Beneficial Owners Don't Have Standing
- Zombie Department Stores Rise (as ugly t-shirts)
- Must All Trademark Owners be Joined?
- Who Owns the Mark Used by a Bunch of People?
- Bratz Copied, But Didn't Infringe
- When You Can Change the Name of the Registrant
- It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time
-
►
December
(10)
-
▼
2008
(95)
-
▼
December
(10)
- Keeping a Trade Secret Secret May Not Be Enough
- It All Looks So Different In the Snow
- The Watchman Returns
- Race To the Swiftest Without Notice
- Who Owns "Joyce Theater"? - the Mark, Not the Buil...
- UK "Own Name" Defense
- Disarmed
- Mattel Now Owns Bratz
- Paying Royalties in the Hereafter
- Shares of Curlin
-
▼
December
(10)
0 comments:
Post a Comment