It pays to read the statute sometimes. If the statute says "the applicant shall file in the Patent and Trademark Office . . . ," having the former applicant file it isn't going to work. The former applicant signed the document before it assigned the mark, but then filed the document after the assignment to the new owner was effective. Under the statute, though, it's the filing that counts, not the timing of the signature.
For the details, see the inestimable TTABlog.
© 2009 Pamela Chestek
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(103)
-
►
August
(12)
- "I Didn't Mention It Was Just a License?"
- "Lizzie Borden B&B wins trademark patent"
- News Flash: Patents Can Be Transferred by Operatio...
- Three Chocolate Companies Run Three Different Ways...
- Just Get Over It
- Standing No More
- Do Ethnic Slurs Mean a New Trial?
- Leibovitz Postcard Anyone?
- Stitch in Time
- Seizing Cuban Trademarks
- MGA Now Has Moxie
- Mongols Can Wear Their Colors
-
▼
June
(11)
- Is a Name Necessarily a Mark?
- Smart Money in Movies
- Small Comfort for MGA Entertainment
- Who Owns the Chirp?
- Uh-oh Moment
- "Filed," Not "Executed"
- No Good News for MGA Entertainment
- Who Was Opportunity Knocking For?
- Will the Real MG Please Stand Up
- What Exactly is "Intellectual Property"?
- Who Owns "Black Sabbath"?
-
►
August
(12)
0 comments:
Post a Comment